Subject	oh yeah... lol.. also carburated... as were the L28 engines. (n/m)
Posted by	Scotts94z32 on June 03, 2003 at 7:19 PM
	This message has been viewed 20 times.
In Reply To	so the 260's were . . . (n/m) posted by sebring1970 (robo) on June 03, 2003 at 06:38 PM
Message
Follow Ups	SZR, Who liked the 240Z in Bruce Almighty... - fantomZ 14:04:55 06/03/03 I didn't see a 240 ;) (n/m) - SactoTodd 14:07:34 06/03/03 my bad 280? (n/m) - fantomZ 14:13:24 06/03/03 wrong wrong wrong.... - Datzun 14:43:42 06/03/03 Why are they the worst made? (n/m) - zdreamer 15:52:18 06/03/03 heavier than the 240, less powerful than the 280 >> - Scotts94z32 16:30:06 06/03/03 Second. I want a 240 and a 280. You can keep the 260. - sebring1970 (robo) 18:17:27 06/03/03 I just sold my 240 that had a 280 engine.. :) - Scotts94z32 18:23:27 06/03/03 so the 260's were . . . (n/m) - sebring1970 (robo) 18:38:36 06/03/03 oh yeah... lol.. also carburated... as were the L28 engines. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 19:19:58 06/03/03 I could never sell my 72 240. Just love that car !!! (n/m) - sumonis 20:44:08 06/03/03 I know a guy with a gold one with less than 50K on it. - zdreamer 18:17:45 06/03/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.